Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Articles arrow_drop_down
  • Submissions arrow_drop_down
  • Editorial Policies arrow_drop_down
  • About arrow_drop_down
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles arrow_drop_down
  • Submissions arrow_drop_down
  • Editorial Policies arrow_drop_down
  • About arrow_drop_down
  • Login
  • Register
menu
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit an Article
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
  • Become a Reviewer
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit an Article
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
  • Become a Reviewer
‘Choose Life!’ Quaker Metaphor and Modernity
Research Article
‘Choose Life!’ Quaker Metaphor and Modernity
Research Article
‘Choose Life!’ Quaker Metaphor and Modernity

Abstract

In 2003, Grace Jantzen presented the George Richardson Lecture, the annual international lecture in Quaker studies, entitled ‘Choose Life! Early Quaker Women and Violence in Modernity’, which was published in Quaker Studies. It was part of her ongoing work on the preoccupation of modernity with death and violence. In the lecture she argued that Margaret Fell and most other early Quaker women encouraged a choice of life over a preoccupation with death, while most male Friends (as Quakers are also called) maintained the violent imagery of the Lamb’s War, the spiritual warfare that would usher in the kingdom. While both men and women developed what became the Quaker ‘peace testimony’ (the witness against war and outward violence), the language used by male and female Friends differed in its description of the inward spiritual life and its consequences and mission. Thus, Grace Jantzen argued that these women Friends were choosing a language counter to modernity, while the male apocalyptic was indeed counter-cultural but still within the frame of modernity. In this article, we take Grace Jantzen’s basic thesis, that a female ‘Choose Life!’ imagery may be set against a male ‘Lamb’s War’ metaphor, and apply it to four sets of Quaker data in other geographic and temporal locations, to explore the extent to which the arguments she sets out can usefully illuminate the nature of Quakerism. This four-fold approach highlights the complexity of the history of Quaker discourse, as well as the continually shifting cultural and social contexts in which Quakers necessarily found themselves embedded. It also brings to the fore how useful an analytical tool Grace Jantzen has given us and not only in situations where we come to agree with her conclusions.

Keywords

Alexander Jaffray, Grace Jantzen, Quaker Faith and Practice, suffrage, Hannah Kilham, Lilias Skene

How to Cite

Dandelion, P., Hagglund, B., Lunn, P. & Newman, E., (2009) “‘Choose Life!’ Quaker Metaphor and Modernity”, Quaker Studies 13(2), 160–183. doi: https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.13.2.160

Downloads

Download PDF
Download XML

76

Views

114

Downloads

Share

𝕏

Authors

Pink Dandelion (Centre for Postgraduate Quaker Studies, Woodbrooke Quaker Study Centre and the University of Birmingham, England)
Betty Hagglund (Centre for Postgraduate Quaker Studies, Woodbrooke Quaker Study Centre and the University of Birmingham, England)
Pam Lunn (Centre for Postgraduate Quaker Studies, Woodbrooke Quaker Study Centre and the University of Birmingham, England)
Edwina Newman (Centre for Postgraduate Quaker Studies, Woodbrooke Quaker Study Centre and the University of Birmingham, England)

Downloads

  • Download PDF
  • Download XML

Issue

  • Volume 13 • Issue 2 • 2009

Publication details

Pages 160–183
Published on 2009-12-01

Licence

Identifiers

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.13.2.160

Peer Review

This article has been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: ff6b98f1fedd3a8cef109d93ac58cc67
  • XML: 17756d96cb47fbab640d428a33c80c31

Table of Contents

Non Specialist Summary

This article has no summary

Close

| ISSN: 2397-1770 | Published by Open Library of Humanities | Privacy Policy |