Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Articles arrow_drop_down
  • Submissions arrow_drop_down
  • Editorial Policies arrow_drop_down
  • About arrow_drop_down
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles arrow_drop_down
  • Submissions arrow_drop_down
  • Editorial Policies arrow_drop_down
  • About arrow_drop_down
  • Login
  • Register
menu
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit an Article
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
  • Become a Reviewer
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit an Article
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
  • Become a Reviewer
Accusations of Blasphemy in English Anti-Quaker Polemic, C. 1660–1701*
Research Article
Accusations of Blasphemy in English Anti-Quaker Polemic, C. 1660–1701*
Research Article
Accusations of Blasphemy in English Anti-Quaker Polemic, C. 1660–1701*

Abstract

This paper investigates the conviction amongst zealous English Protestants, living between 1660 and 1701, that Quakerism constituted a form of blasphemy. Through an analysis of the accusation of blasphemy in anti-Quaker polemic it develops a cultural history of blasphemy as representation, illuminating a spiritual critique of Quakerism as enthusiastic antitrinitarianism and a sense of blasphemy commensurate with Thomistic theology. In so doing, this paper provides an insight into the contemporary theological anxiety that Quakerism was fundamentally wicked and anti-Christian.

Keywords

anti-Quaker, theology, blasphemy, antitrinitarianism, enthusiasm, polemic

How to Cite

Manning, D., (2009) “Accusations of Blasphemy in English Anti-Quaker Polemic, C. 1660–1701*”, Quaker Studies 14(1), 27–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.14.1.27

Downloads

Download PDF
Download XML

68

Views

203

Downloads

Share

𝕏

Authors

David Manning (University of Cambridge, England)

Downloads

  • Download PDF
  • Download XML

Issue

  • Volume 14 • Issue 1 • 2010

Publication details

Pages 27–56
Published on 2009-02-28

Licence

Identifiers

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.14.1.27

Peer Review

This article has been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: d78cbf3dc080e719262cd7889773f5f1
  • XML: d7851ad77d877bacba1d5a10b604892e

Table of Contents

Non Specialist Summary

This article has no summary

Close

| ISSN: 2397-1770 | Published by Open Library of Humanities | Privacy Policy |