Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Articles arrow_drop_down
  • Submissions arrow_drop_down
  • Editorial Policies arrow_drop_down
  • About arrow_drop_down
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles arrow_drop_down
  • Submissions arrow_drop_down
  • Editorial Policies arrow_drop_down
  • About arrow_drop_down
  • Login
  • Register
menu
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit an Article
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
  • Become a Reviewer
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit an Article
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
  • Become a Reviewer
Caroline Stephen and the Opposition to British Women’s Suffrage
Research Article
Caroline Stephen and the Opposition to British Women’s Suffrage
Research Article
Caroline Stephen and the Opposition to British Women’s Suffrage

Abstract

The article explores the provenance and nature of Caroline Stephen’s opposition to British women’s suffrage, setting this issue within the context of her life and times. Her influences included male relatives, life as a Victorian daughter-at-home and religious experience as a convinced Quaker and enthusiastic member of Women’s Yearly Meeting. Far from being anomalous, Caroline Stephen’s anti-suffragism reflected widespread doubts over the appropriateness of women’s entry into parliamentary politics. The Religious Society of Friends was divided on the subject and her eloquence was a valuable support to conservative gender views within the Society and beyond it. Caroline Stephen contributed towards developing a positive, woman-centred opposition to the vote which celebrated gender difference and the value of femininity. She wrote as a Quaker and the religious basis of her views gave them particular power.

Keywords

women, Quaker, suffrage, gender, British, conservative

How to Cite

Bush, J., (2010) “Caroline Stephen and the Opposition to British Women’s Suffrage”, Quaker Studies 15(1), 32–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.15.1.32

Downloads

Download XML
Download PDF

90

Views

104

Downloads

Share

𝕏

Authors

Julia Bush (University of Northampton, England)

Downloads

  • Download XML
  • Download PDF

Issue

  • Volume 15 • Issue 1 • 2010

Publication details

Pages 32–52
Published on 2010-02-28

Licence

Identifiers

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.15.1.32

Peer Review

This article has been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • XML: 776da760db8f78375f042f647ab429d4
  • PDF: 464cc69458a33db822753429485f9216

Table of Contents

Non Specialist Summary

This article has no summary

Close

| ISSN: 2397-1770 | Published by Open Library of Humanities | Privacy Policy |