Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Articles arrow_drop_down
  • Submissions arrow_drop_down
  • Editorial Policies arrow_drop_down
  • About arrow_drop_down
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles arrow_drop_down
  • Submissions arrow_drop_down
  • Editorial Policies arrow_drop_down
  • About arrow_drop_down
  • Login
  • Register
menu
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit an Article
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
  • Become a Reviewer
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit an Article
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
  • Become a Reviewer
Grasping the Nettle: Conflict and the Quaker Condition
Research Article
Grasping the Nettle: Conflict and the Quaker Condition
Research Article
Grasping the Nettle: Conflict and the Quaker Condition

Abstract

Conflict among Quakers is unexpected: the espoused image of the Quaker community is peaceful and tranquil. In the community narrative, commitment to ‘mend the world’ is undoubted but conflict within the community is handled with aversion, not articulated, and harmony is privileged above justice. The ‘theory in use’ is ‘don’t ask, don’t tell, don’t even think about it’. Quaker identity is cherished and challenges to it provide the rationale for intractable conflict sagas. The hesitation of the ‘absolute perhaps’ is visible in unwillingness to appear authoritative about tackling conflict. A different account is reported from Ireland Yearly Meeting where Friends appear to be able to grasp the nettle of conflict and remain friends.

Keywords

community narrative, Quaker conflict, sociality, theories of action

How to Cite

Robson, S., (2010) “Grasping the Nettle: Conflict and the Quaker Condition”, Quaker Studies 15(1), 67–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.15.1.67

Downloads

Download XML
Download PDF

189

Views

190

Downloads

Share

𝕏

Authors

Susan Robson (Leeds, England)

Downloads

  • Download XML
  • Download PDF

Issue

  • Volume 15 • Issue 1 • 2010

Publication details

Pages 67–83
Published on 2010-03-01

Licence

Identifiers

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.15.1.67

Peer Review

This article has been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • XML: cf099b40dfc47987f9ff90c585bebefb
  • PDF: f178cec5e71cfcf1d11f1a69c8965d45

Table of Contents

Non Specialist Summary

This article has no summary

Close

| ISSN: 2397-1770 | Published by Open Library of Humanities | Privacy Policy |