Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Articles arrow_drop_down
  • Submissions arrow_drop_down
  • Editorial Policies arrow_drop_down
  • About arrow_drop_down
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles arrow_drop_down
  • Submissions arrow_drop_down
  • Editorial Policies arrow_drop_down
  • About arrow_drop_down
  • Login
  • Register
menu
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit an Article
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
  • Become a Reviewer
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit an Article
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
  • Become a Reviewer
Present and Prevented, 2006 and 2008: Summary Report on the Survey of the 11 May 2008 and Comparison with the Survey of the 7 May 2006*
Research Article
Present and Prevented, 2006 and 2008: Summary Report on the Survey of the 11 May 2008 and Comparison with the Survey of the 7 May 2006*
Research Article
Present and Prevented, 2006 and 2008: Summary Report on the Survey of the 11 May 2008 and Comparison with the Survey of the 7 May 2006*

Abstract

This article gives an interim report of the tripartite longitudinal study within Britain Yearly Meeting on worship and business meeting attendance and on appointments being made within Local and Area Meetings.

Keywords

Nominations, Meetings, Worship, Business Method, Britain Yearly Meeting

How to Cite

Chadkirk, B. & Dandelion, P., (2010) “Present and Prevented, 2006 and 2008: Summary Report on the Survey of the 11 May 2008 and Comparison with the Survey of the 7 May 2006*”, Quaker Studies 15(1), 84–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.15.1.84

Downloads

Download PDF
Download XML

58

Views

87

Downloads

Share

𝕏

Authors

Bill Chadkirk (University of Birmingham, England)
Pink Dandelion (University of Birmingham, England)

Downloads

  • Download PDF
  • Download XML

Issue

  • Volume 15 • Issue 1 • 2010

Publication details

Pages 84–97
Published on 2010-03-01

Licence

Identifiers

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.15.1.84

Peer Review

This article has been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: ed1b4c87e02b6f84d078881ca0b1c8d8
  • XML: cbaecf97dcf0cb9f9a17a7dc77a7e074

Table of Contents

Non Specialist Summary

This article has no summary

Close

| ISSN: 2397-1770 | Published by Open Library of Humanities | Privacy Policy |