Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Articles arrow_drop_down
  • Submissions arrow_drop_down
  • Editorial Policies arrow_drop_down
  • About arrow_drop_down
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles arrow_drop_down
  • Submissions arrow_drop_down
  • Editorial Policies arrow_drop_down
  • About arrow_drop_down
  • Login
  • Register
menu
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit an Article
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
  • Become a Reviewer
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit an Article
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
  • Become a Reviewer
Muggletonian–Quaker Debates
Research Article
Muggletonian–Quaker Debates
Research Article
Muggletonian–Quaker Debates

Abstract

The Quaker Christ within necessitated a belief in the immortal soul that was identified with the pre-existent Christ whose body of ‘flesh and bone’ was an immaterial uncreated substance. The Muggletonians stood well within the tradition of orthodoxy by advocating for a Christ whose glorified body of flesh was confined to the bodily form of a man. Fox’s Christ might have been truer to the earliest traditions of Christianity established by St. Paul who was deeply influenced by Greek thought but by the time we reach the seventeenth century Fox was well outside the fold of theological orthodoxy. As long as Fox was alive he and the majority of his followers were considered to hold grossly unorthodox, unbalanced and even blasphemous views about Christ. By focusing on the debates between Quakers and adversaries such as the Muggletonians it becomes apparent that the controversy created by differing ideas of what constituted ‘divine eternal unchangeable substance’ was both fundamental and irreconcilable.

Keywords

substance, John Reeve, Lodowick Muggleton, Christology, George Fox, witchcraft

How to Cite

Bailey, R., (2011) “Muggletonian–Quaker Debates”, Quaker Studies 16(1), 74–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.16.1.74

Downloads

Download PDF
Download XML

71

Views

109

Downloads

Share

𝕏

Authors

Richard Bailey (Queen’s University (Kingston), Canada)

Downloads

  • Download PDF
  • Download XML

Issue

  • Volume 16 • Issue 1 • 2011

Publication details

Pages 74–84
Published on 2011-02-28

Licence

Identifiers

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.16.1.74

Peer Review

This article has been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: fd202ad5ea8d02e4b1605c5acceaeb50
  • XML: 097677d8ff47c169853beb6b540d6a37

Table of Contents

Non Specialist Summary

This article has no summary

Close

| ISSN: 2397-1770 | Published by Open Library of Humanities | Privacy Policy |