Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Policies
  • About
  • Log in
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Policies
  • About
  • Log in
  • Register
Open navigation menu
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit an Article
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
  • Become a Reviewer
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit an Article
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
  • Become a Reviewer
Opening the Shutters: Gurneyite Quakerism and the Struggle for Women’s Equality in the Meeting for Business, 1859 to 1930
Research Article
Opening the Shutters: Gurneyite Quakerism and the Struggle for Women’s Equality in the Meeting for Business, 1859 to 1930
Research Article
Opening the Shutters: Gurneyite Quakerism and the Struggle for Women’s Equality in the Meeting for Business, 1859 to 1930

Abstract

In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries American Gurneyite Quakers ended the practice of having separate women’s Meetings for Business. This article examines the discourse among Gurneyite Quakers that argued for and against ending these separate Meetings and the creation of co-gendered ‘joint’ Meetings. It argues based on this inquiry that while this process may have been linked to larger shifts in gender roles that were occurring within American religious life, it also arose out of circumstances that were particular to Quakerism. Further, this paper raises questions about what the consequences were for Gurneyite women of eliminating Women’s Meetings, suggesting that it may actually have worked to marginalize them and restrict their roles in church governance.

Keywords

Women, equality, Gurneyite, men, Meeting for Business, Rufus Jones, gender

How to Cite

May, I., (2014) “Opening the Shutters: Gurneyite Quakerism and the Struggle for Women’s Equality in the Meeting for Business, 1859 to 1930”, Quaker Studies 18(2), 170–190. doi: https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.18.2.170

Downloads

Download PDF
View PDF
Download XML

Share

Author

    • Isaac May
    • Harvard University, USA

Downloads

  • Download PDF
  • View PDF
  • Download XML

Issue

  • Volume 18 • Issue 2 • 2014

Publication details

Pages 170–190
Published on 2014-11-30

Licence

Identifiers

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.18.2.170

Peer Review

This article has been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: b5b5331127d4d204f9f202b5073b3f85
  • XML: 27e4021ccd68f8439bf1edbd88beec06

Table of Contents

Non Specialist Summary

This article has no summary

Close

| ISSN: 2397-1770 | Published by Open Library of Humanities | Privacy Policy |