Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Articles arrow_drop_down
  • Submissions arrow_drop_down
  • Editorial Policies arrow_drop_down
  • About arrow_drop_down
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles arrow_drop_down
  • Submissions arrow_drop_down
  • Editorial Policies arrow_drop_down
  • About arrow_drop_down
  • Login
  • Register
menu
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit an Article
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
  • Become a Reviewer
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit an Article
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
  • Become a Reviewer
Understanding Quaker Religious Language in its Community Context
Research Article
Understanding Quaker Religious Language in its Community Context
Research Article
Understanding Quaker Religious Language in its Community Context

Abstract

This article examines a trend in British Quaker use of religious language towards using lists of names for ‘that which we worship’, especially lists which include terms from other religions as well as traditionally Quaker terminology. It offers some tools for understanding language, drawn from the work of Wittgenstein and Lindbeck, and some key contexts, including a discussion of Quaker universalism about truth and the role this plays in the way that Quakers now speak about God. It finishes with a worked example which enables us to see how all these factors play into the construction of Quaker multi-theǝlogy remarks.

Keywords

Lindbeck, Wittgenstein, theology, diversity, language, universalism

How to Cite

Grant, R., (2015) “Understanding Quaker Religious Language in its Community Context”, Quaker Studies 19(2), 260–276. doi: https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.19.2.260

Downloads

Download PDF
Download XML

81

Views

99

Downloads

Share

𝕏

Authors

Rhiannon Grant (University of Leeds, England)

Downloads

  • Download PDF
  • Download XML

Issue

  • Volume 19 • Issue 2 • 2015

Publication details

Pages 260–276
Published on 2015-12-01

Licence

Identifiers

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.19.2.260

Peer Review

This article has been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: 630434e2d70896ef478aa33ba940fb27
  • XML: c23cc832cd7eab6f9147e9c9fe35de2d

Table of Contents

Non Specialist Summary

This article has no summary

Close

| ISSN: 2397-1770 | Published by Open Library of Humanities | Privacy Policy |