Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Articles arrow_drop_down
  • Submissions arrow_drop_down
  • Editorial Policies arrow_drop_down
  • About arrow_drop_down
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles arrow_drop_down
  • Submissions arrow_drop_down
  • Editorial Policies arrow_drop_down
  • About arrow_drop_down
  • Login
  • Register
menu
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit an Article
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
  • Become a Reviewer
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit an Article
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
  • Become a Reviewer
A Body Divided: British Quakers, Patriotism and War, 1899–1919
Research Article
A Body Divided: British Quakers, Patriotism and War, 1899–1919
Research Article
A Body Divided: British Quakers, Patriotism and War, 1899–1919

Abstract

Two-thirds of young Quaker men did not enlist during the First World War, an illustration of a wartime division within the British Society of Friends between the call of civic duty and adherence to historic peace principles. Those who chose to remain at home actively protested against the war and subsequently against implementation in 1916 of compulsory military service. Other Quakers were unable to decide which way to turn. Early on in the war, alternatives were made available to young Quaker men, such as the Friends’ Ambulance Unit, but imprisoned Quaker absolutists became the saintly heroes of the wartime Society of Friends, following, as they did, in the steps of early Friends who suffered imprisonment for conscience’ sake.

Keywords

Friends’ Service Committee, peace testimony, No-Conscription Fellowship, Friends’ Ambulance Unit, First World War

How to Cite

Kennedy, T., (2016) “A Body Divided: British Quakers, Patriotism and War, 1899–1919”, Quaker Studies 21(2), 159–167. doi: https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.2016.21.2.3

Downloads

Download XML
Download PDF

75

Views

162

Downloads

Share

𝕏

Authors

Thomas C. Kennedy (University of Arkansas, USA tkennedy@uark.edu)

Downloads

  • Download XML
  • Download PDF

Issue

  • Volume 21 • Issue 2 • 2016

Publication details

Pages 159–167
Published on 2016-12-01

Licence

Identifiers

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.2016.21.2.3

Peer Review

This article has been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • XML: ba64aa5171d093b483a68d567ca867df
  • PDF: 9a7dd47aa89eaf59c966a1c81873d9d8

Table of Contents

Non Specialist Summary

This article has no summary

Close

| ISSN: 2397-1770 | Published by Open Library of Humanities | Privacy Policy |