Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Articles arrow_drop_down
  • Submissions arrow_drop_down
  • Editorial Policies arrow_drop_down
  • About arrow_drop_down
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Articles arrow_drop_down
  • Submissions arrow_drop_down
  • Editorial Policies arrow_drop_down
  • About arrow_drop_down
  • Login
  • Register
menu
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit an Article
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
  • Become a Reviewer
  • Articles
  • Issues
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit an Article
  • Journal Policies
  • Publisher Policies
  • About
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
  • Become a Reviewer
How Ecology, Economics, and Ethics Brought Winstanley and Nitobe to Quakerism
Research Article
How Ecology, Economics, and Ethics Brought Winstanley and Nitobe to Quakerism
Research Article
How Ecology, Economics, and Ethics Brought Winstanley and Nitobe to Quakerism

Abstract

Gerrard Winstanley, the seventeenth-century English leader of the True Levellers, as they called themselves, a Dissenter group better known as the Diggers, and Inazo Nitobe, co-founder of the nineteenth-century Sapporo Band in Japan and Under-Secretary-General of the League of Nations, were both involved in founding indigenous Christian movements but ultimately joined the Religious Society of Friends. Their views about agricultural ecology, personal financial troubles and ethical commitments led them to Quakerism. Each believed there was no separation of the ethical, spiritual and secular within the experience of nature and ecological cultivation, and shared a commitment to earthcare, sustainable farming, non-violence and ethical living.

Keywords

ecology, agriculture, economics, Gerrard Winstanley, Japan, Inazo Nitobe

How to Cite

(2017) “How Ecology, Economics, and Ethics Brought Winstanley and Nitobe to Quakerism”, Quaker Studies 22(1), 21–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.2017.22.1.3

Downloads

Download PDF
Download XML

69

Views

105

Downloads

Share

𝕏

Downloads

  • Download PDF
  • Download XML

Issue

  • Volume 22 • Issue 1 • 2017

Publication details

Pages 21–45
Published on 2017-05-31

Licence

Identifiers

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.2017.22.1.3

Peer Review

This article has been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: eb5111951e7ea71ab158d6649d339996
  • XML: 1812d8366d1a9c1c1ef98be791b0bb25

Table of Contents

Non Specialist Summary

This article has no summary

Close

| ISSN: 2397-1770 | Published by Open Library of Humanities | Privacy Policy |